What's Enlightenment? The teachings of Brian Hoffmeister and ACIM

Problem: What's Enlightenment?

Thanks for asking the issues that can come to your mind, even though they seem “somewhat peculiar” to you. In Enlightenment all perceived suffering has faded, for what but wrong-mindedness appeared to produce the misperception named pain.

Suffering was the impression that Christ could leave a Warm Creator's Mind. “If pain is real there is no God. If God is true there's no pain.”(W-190.3) The latter does work since Lord a course in miracles doesn't have opposite. Enlightenment entails no suffering or displeasure about ANYTHING, for Enlightenment is Real, Constant Pleasure, Peace, Flexibility, and Joy. Being Regular, Enlightenment knows maybe not of change. The impression of susceptibility and changing thoughts went as well. There is no ego to drop “straight back into.” Soul Abides in gentle Love. All suffering is over Now and nothing stays but a benefit of Stillness.

The Holy Heart is the reminder that Living is Eternal. The Provide Moment may be the gate way to Eternity. The entire world of photographs was a full world of illusion. Photographs are thus natural to the Holy Spirit. They were “neutralized” the immediate they did actually arise.

What does that mean with regards to the second problem? You cannot eliminate what's never lived, and in the Holy Spirit's Perception of forgiveness damage is impossible. Bodies were never created and never die because the planet of pictures is the past. It's difficult to get origins and endings in a software that is already prepared and over long ago. There's no living in images. Here is the indicating of “Hold no graven images prior to the Master Thy God.” All images were designed to unknown the Reality from awareness, and they could just be forgiven as you illusion. If illusions might be divided up in to living and lifeless, organic and inorganic, animate and inanimate Enlightenment could be impossible. For what is Enlightenment but Genuine Oneness, far beyond the possibility of division of all kinds? The split brain was the illusion. Find to not task the separate brain to types and contact some types living and some forms dead. Lord understands perhaps not form. The separate brain appeared to be the “killer” illusion, the Sacred Spirit tells the sleeping brain that what's whole and good can never BE split. In Heaven Brain is One Heart, and actually with regard to this world forgiveness reflects that Oneness. The forgiven world identifies the unity of the recovered mind and sees that there surely is nothing “outside” of this simple mind which dreams softly a pleased, light dream. The target of ACIM would be to desire gently of a sinless world. That purpose is more than probable, it is inevitable!

For my seeming diet, “eat what is served” may be the Advice I was handed from the Sacred Nature many years ago. Join along with your brother and let no idea come between the Enjoy you share. This Advice hasn't changed. “Dinner” is always a foundation for discussing the Delight of the Residing Moment. What the world calls “breathing” and “eating” and “drinking” and “sleeping” are really yet in the Enlightened State. The Recovered Perspective considers the sameness of things since each of them reveal exactly the same Purpose: forgiveness. That Perception is not “personal,” for in unified perception nothing is personal. Lord is no respecter of persons. I practically can't “take” an animal's “life” since Life is Spirit and can just only be extensive or Provided as God Gives. “Take” does not have any indicating within my mind and because animals haven't “lived” it's impossible that they could “die.” The opinion indicated in the idea “individually get an animal's life” has many main assumptions that are false. In right-mindedness it is evident that a few ideas are strengthened because they are given out or shared, and “taking” a “life” or anything more has no meaning. All that I provide is fond of mySelf, and in offering there's no loss, no lose, and nothing is ever removed from wholeness and unity. The teacher of God does not need something that cannot be given away. Such is the Joy of wonders! The thought seeds be seemingly flung every where, yet there's never a view back to see where in actuality the seeds land. The seeds are never for an “other,” and since offering and receiving are the same your head receives the gifts it gives. This really is really the party you find for within the ego's questions.

The sole problem that need be asked is just a question that is not really absurd at all: Am I prepared to learn that God's May and My Own would be the Same? God's May for Me is for Great Happiness. And what but this May could be the May of Christ? Joyfully, nothing may change Endless Love. Thank You Lord!