A Course in Miracles Unedited

A Course in Miracles unedited is an edition that contains material that has been removed from the popular official blue edition of the Course. This material includes explanations about sex, homosexuality and relationships that were deemed too personal or controversial for publication in the Course by Helen Schucman and Bill Thetford. Original dictation by Jesus

Many scholars believe that the Bible was written through a process of dictation. However, this is not the only way to explain the biblical texts. For example, there are passages of prophecy in both the Old and New Testament that offer futuristic mysterious concepts that can’t be known to men when they were first given. These prophecies have been fulfilled in the future, which is evidence that dictation was used as a general method of scripture composition.

Dictation is a type of inspiration that occurs when God speaks to an individual, and then they record what He says. The person doing the writing does not influence the finished product by their own style, vocabulary, or influences. This is different than the Bible’s version of inspiration, which is when God inspires a person to write something.

The present writer has been interested in evidence for dictation-type inspiration since attending a seminar on this topic in Canada. One of the most notable examples of this type of inspiration is the speech of Balaam’s donkey. God gave this creature the ability to speak in Balaam’s language, but He also imbued it with a human-like intellect that allowed the donkey to reason with Balaam and lead him to a conclusion.

Another example of dictation-type inspiration is in the Zechariah passage, where Christ dictated thoughts to Judas, priests, and elders to motivate them to act in certain ways after his betrayal. These actions were in stark contrast to their usual covetousness, and they illustrate that dictation can be used to motivate people to perform acts of righteousness.

This type of inspiration is particularly useful for prophets who need to communicate with the people of Israel in a short period of time. This can be accomplished through a written text, or even an oral presentation. This can help to prevent misunderstandings, which can happen when the speaker tries to convey complex ideas or concepts in a short amount of time.

While the voice of Jesus is central to the Gospels and Christian tradition, other voices are heard much less frequently. The putative voice-hearing experiences of Jesus, Peter, Paul, and John (the author of Revelation) are woven into the narratives of the gospels, but they don’t form a consistent narrative or pattern throughout the canon. This demonstrates that the biblical authors weren’t involved in a complete reportage of Jesus’ life, but rather a selection of relevant stories. Editing by Helen

This week we’re joined by editor Helen Hawaz (GOOD NIGHT OPPY, TURNING RED) to discuss her early inspiration for visual storytelling and how she has grown her career. Plus, we hear her thoughts on the significance of editing for documentary filmmaking.

Helen is a copy, developmental, and line editor of fiction in all genres. She also does proofreading and is a book reviewer, beta reader (manuscript evaluator), and sensitivity/diversity reader. She’s worked on manuscripts from authors located all over the world.

In her professional life, Helen has written and edited most types of documents that government departments and non-profit organisations use, so she understands what ministers, governance boards, funding committees, managers, staff, and the public need to be able to read in their own words. She also knows how to help them get that information out clearly and quickly. This experience brings a useful perspective to the editing work she does with her clients, which includes preparing their novels for submission to agents and publishers. She encourages her clients to push their writing to new heights. She works with authors of all levels, from first drafts to published books. She has a postgraduate qualification in editing and proofreading from Whitireia, New Zealand. Editing by Bill Thetford

In October of 1965, Helen Schucman heard a voice that told her “This is a course in miracles. Take notes.” Over the next seven years, she took down in shorthand what would later become A Course in Miracles. Each day, she read her notes to her colleague William Thetford and he typed them. They became the earliest version of what is now known as the Urtext edition of ACIM.

The early circulation of the text in a non-centralized way, passing from hand to hand and being copied multiple times, was an essential part of its evolution. It was the very process that created the community of readers that ultimately made the Course a unified group in its own right. The tension between this vision of community and the centralized publishing model that was used to release the first version of the book is reflected in the two contrasting versions of the Course available today.

Both the urtext and the truncated, six-black-thumbnail thesis binders that were photocopied in 1975, the latter of which is sometimes called the Cayce Version or HLC, have been released into public domain by the Foundation for Inner Peace, and are widely circulated on the internet. These versions are different from the current official authorized edition published by the Foundation for Inner Peace because they contain material that Jesus removed during the transcription and editing process. The reason for the removal of this material is that it was either personal to Schucman or controversial. um curso em milagres videos youtube

Despite this, it is still important to read the Urtext Edition of ACIM to understand the true history of the Course. Whether or not this is the edition you choose to study, it is helpful to be aware of how much of the original text has been edited by Helen and Bill Thetford. This is especially true of the early chapters that are devoted to explanations of Jesus’ foundation stone teachings, such as his teaching on “Spiritual Eye” vs. “Holy Spirit,” Christ guidance vs. “Christ control,” and His statements on human sexuality. This is an extremely important part of the text and is missing from most current editions of the Course. Editing by Kenneth Wapnick

The editing of A Course in Miracles was a complicated and controversial process. Initially, Helen and Bill removed any personal material from the notes they had taken. They also edited the text of the course, making it more accessible to a larger audience. However, they did not take out any of the meaning of the course. However, they did edit the pacing and the language of the course to make it more formal. They also made changes to the chapter titles and section headings in the text.

In early 2000, an unedited version of the Course, called the urtext or Hugh Lynn Cayce version (HLC), was released on the Internet. This was a serious blow to the Foundation for Inner Peace, which holds the copyright to the official published edition of the course. It also refueled speculations about the reasons why the course was copyrighted.

According to Kenneth Wapnick, the original scribes of A Course in Miracles were instructed to leave editorial decisions to Bill. The instructions were clear: “If it seems that what you are taking down is too personal to benefit other people, take it out.” However, this guiding principle was more of an instruction for the scribes than a statement of Jesus’ will. It led to far more editing than necessary.

The earliest chapters of the Course are more down-to-earth than later ones, which are more spiritual and esoteric. The early material includes discussions of relationships, interactions, and developmental issues. In addition, Jesus talks about Helen and Bill’s background in psychology, including Freud, Jung, and Rank. However, most of this material has been removed from the published edition.

One of the most significant aspects of A Course in Miracles is its radical non-dualistic thought system, which terrifies our ego identity and teaches us to let go of our attachment to it. This system of thought is so radical that it has sparked debates about its validity in the scientific community and has even been accused of being anti-scientific. Yet the Course is so powerful that it has had a worldwide influence.

AUTHOR: JAZZY EXPERT – Search Engine Optimization Team Head at Linkendin