The criminal trespass charge
… is based on false pretenses.
I was a PSU honors student who was banned & suspended because of an unfair, biased review for exercising protected speech.
Conduct review is biased because they relied on eye-witness testimony over hard evidence and used the lowest standard of proof (i.e., preponderance of the evidence).
I was protesting against gender-based discrimination from the PSU club. Title IX applies to student clubs and organizations.
… is invalid due contradictory evidence
I was given visitor passes and a library card to the Miller Price Library on March 31st and April 1st.
I was granted permission via visitor pass. I was never asked to leave by the staff. Rather, I was greeted and welcomed by the staff.
Circumstances
No posted signs stating that suspended or excluded students are banned from the library
Public libraries have the connotation of being open to the public, and indeed, Miller Price library is open to the public
Even though I was suspended, I was under the impression that access to a public library was a human right. Indeed, PSU is a public university.
Jordan Banks, the conduct officer, failed to educate me by mentioning I was banned from a public library or giving me a map of buildings I was excluded from.
Psychiatrist letter given to conduct review, affirming that I experienced discrimination in the form of “social exclusion” and “periods of rejection”